It was a short while (25 Apr 99 16:02:28 +0000) since Ian Greenway mentioned some 
stuff...

> I just happened to notice this...
> 
> I've only got AGA so I've been running V on a 256-colour screen.  In
> an effort to speed up scrolling, I reduced that to 64 colours. 
> 
> The settings for images in Voyager prefs allow selection of dithering,
> colour quantization and DCT accuracy.  Some of which are specific to
> jpgs.  It seems that if "Quantiztion=2-pass " is selected, the other
> functions are meaningless.  So an undithered 64-colour image is
> produced. Selecting Quantization=simple, will permit some sort of
> dithering, but at an even worse output quality than before.
> 
> So strangely, 256-colour dithered with simple-Q looks awful, whereas
> 2-pass Q no dither looks ok.  Why can't I get 2-pass *and* dithered,
> which would look almost perfect in 256-colour?
> 
> Am I missing something?  Will there be any mods in VNG 3 in the image
> handling?
> 
> Before anybody says it - I know. Get a gfx card.  In fact I've got a
> question about that.  The BVision is a good option for me because I
> like to tempt fate and I could try and cram it into a desktop A1200. 
> But some people said you could actually overload the motherboard pcb
> tracking like this.  Is that really true?

I don't quite understand what you mean by 'overloading the tracking'
but it does draw more power than the A1200motherboard can supply. 
Inside a tower this is fixed by adding a second power input to the
motherboard!  And also when you have it stuck in a desktop the
Permedia2 gets VERY VERY hot and would probably lead to lots of
crashes and it's not worth the hassle (unless you get a tower).

Dinky do,


Mike.

-- 
.--------------------------------- ---- -    -- --------.
| AMiGA 1200EZT 060/PPC@240Mhz,50Mb RAM __/\__          |
| 4 HDD,DD&HD FD,5 CD-ROMS,CDRW,EZ135,  \ o0 / bUDDa/S^D|
| SCSI+IDE,56kModem,BVGfX,19"VDU        /_ v_\          |
`------------------------------- --- -    \/   -- ------'
  http://fly.to/BuddasWurld               ICQ: 29173597

Reply via email to