Dark 1 said,
>> The *only* way to 'fix' these (remember a lot of JS 'errors' are due to
>> sucky JS code!) is to list the sites.
> Much as we all might hate the thought if it, surely the most risk free way to
> implement Javascript, is to do it exactly the way MS Explorer does, whether
> that's stictly the right way or not.
> Does that make sence, or am I over simplifying things?
You are. IE's JS implementation goes against the standard, so writing
for IE can result in code that breaks on browsers that follow the rules.
Stick to the standards, anything else is anarchy.
Neil
--
Neil Bothwick - http://www.wirenet.co.uk icq://16361788
Connected via Wirenet, The UK's first Amiga-only internet access provider
--
Nobody's perfect and since I'm nobody...!
_____________________________________________________________
NetConnect mailing list. To unsubscribe, send an 'unsubcribe'
message to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
