GK>>> PowerSaver? No.
GK>>
GK>> this is not a patch
GK> So? It is a part of MCP and it is not going to be in OS3.5, but this
GK> is the kind of thing that belongs in an OS.
you were listing used patches, aint' you? well, this is not a patch. I agree
that such utility could be supplied with the os as a standard feature, but
however using a "standard" one or a third party one don't make any
difference imho. So better spend programmers' time to
inetgrate/fix/standardize something more important.
GK>> naaaa... first the os should be rewritten to support it natively to
GK>> have good performance, and in any case IMHO aga is too slow to make it
GK>> worth. On a gfx card may be better, but anyway I see this patch as
GK>> something superfluous.
GK> So you are agreeing with me that this is a feature that should be in
GK> OS3.5 but isn't going to be.
no. sorry for my bad english (if this is the cause) but that's not what I
said. I said the exact opposite :)
GK> quite a minor thing and I could live without it but it is still nice.
I agree
GK>>> Wait Validate? No.
GK>> this is not a patch. just a little program that wait the validate
GK>> process to finish before quitting (and thus making the
GK>> startup-sequence go on)
GK> It would be easy to include this then but AFAIK it is not.
right, maybe a mail to h&p could make them include it. but who knows, maybe
the new ffs have such feature built-in....
GK>> I would like to see a increased stack value for ramlib :)
GK> What you mean like MCPramlibPatch does?
yes.
--
Shiva
"The waves can't be as high as they pretend to be"
(Angra, Silence and distance)
Impossibile Formattare A:, Passo a C:
_____________________________________________________________
NetConnect mailing list. To unsubscribe, send an 'unsubcribe'
message to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
