>>> cause the startup-sequence to ignore the > ROM-libs and >>> load new library versions instead. > >> More patches like the PPC.library patch > currently. Not >> good. > > so an o.s. loading its rom or part of its rom from > disk is a huge patch patching itself? :) No but the BVPPC patches a ROM to stop the ROM library getting priority over the disk based library. So you would either need tomake a ROM image to be maped into fast RAM, or create some patch to blot out the current libraries in OS3.1 ROM which can be loaded from disk instead. But I do not know the exact mechanics of it. _____________________________________________________________ NetConnect mailing list. To unsubscribe, send an 'unsubcribe' message to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
- [netconnect] Re: OS3.5 or NC3? (was Re: nc3 upgrade?) Mike Carter
- [netconnect] Re: OS3.5 or NC3? (was Re: nc3 upgrade?) Matteo Cavalleri
- [netconnect] Re: OS3.5 or NC3? (was Re: nc3 upgrade?) Gavin Kinsey
- [netconnect] Re: OS3.5 or NC3? (was Re: nc3 upgrade?) Matteo Cavalleri
- [netconnect] Re: OS3.5 or NC3? (was Re: nc3 upgrade?) Mike Carter
- [netconnect] Re: OS3.5 or NC3? (was Re: nc3 upgrade?) Matteo Cavalleri
- [netconnect] Re: OS3.5 or NC3? (was Re: nc3 upgrade?) Mike Carter
- [netconnect] Re: OS3.5 or NC3? (was Re: nc3 upgrade?) Dirk Harlaar
- [netconnect] Re: OS3.5 or NC3? (was Re: nc3 upgrade?) Mike Carter
- [netconnect] Re: OS3.5 or NC3? (was Re: nc3 upgrade?) Matteo Cavalleri
- [netconnect] Re: OS3.5 or NC3? (was Re: nc3 upgrade?) Mike Carter
- [netconnect] Re: OS3.5 or NC3? (was Re: nc3 upgrade?) Tom Waddington
- [netconnect] Re: OS3.5 or NC3? (was Re: nc3 upgrade?) Mike Carter
- [netconnect] Re: OS3.5 or NC3? (was Re: nc3 upgrade?) Matteo Cavalleri
