Regarding a recent message on [netconnect] Re: AmiTCP 4 (was Re: Re: All these
"newversions")...
�
�>
�
�> I never claimed AmiTCP 4 was still in development, if you open your
�> damn lazy eyes I stated "original AmiTCP 4". Just because
�> development has stopped on a product* DOES NOT MEAN IT STOPS
�> WORKING!*
�
� Mike, come on. You said 'your choice is AmiTCP 4', which was
� discontinued ages ago. Genesis doesn't 'stop working' either, so why
� on earth tell people to go for (an ancient) AmiTCP 4, over a working
� copy of Genesis. It makes no sense!
NO NO NO, I said "now you have the choice of Miami or the original AmiTCP
4", I was making Miami the choice, of use the original AmiTCP as a
second choice. I did not say they should go for it over Genesis,
Genesis functions perfect for me and the majority of users so why is
there any current need to upgrade / change TCP/IP stacks at all?
�> Genesis took the original AMiTCP code and added a modern interface
�> to its functions. And slapped some new code in to and probably
�> further developed it. BTW people, this is not offical just what I
�> am assuming.
�
� Oh, so you are now the Genesis coder too, and now make your
� 'statement' on how the code was put together, despite me actually
� informing you that it's a lot more than a 'modern interface to
� AmiTCP'.
According to the 'About' requester of Genesis it is based on the
amitcp 4 code. One of the notable enhancments that came from Genesis
was the MUI interface, amongst the other items you specified
elsewhere. And in *no way* did I claim to be the coder, nor involved
with the Genesis product in any way. Read what you want Chris, it makes
no difference to me.
� My oh my, your are making statements, wrongly, *after* I tell you
� the truth. You do realise that Genesis was based on my
� idea/functionality?
�
� 'Slapped in new code' is a bit of an understatement to say the
� least. It took around a year to 'slap in' this code, mainly due to a
� lot of re-writing of core AmiTCP functionality.
'Slap in' has no reference to how much, how complex etc any additional
programming was. You cannot make anything from my words.
�> Crawl back into your class room Chris. I personally don't know how
�> you managed to spread out a simple statment into a complete mail
�> full of derived junk.
�
� As your absolute ridiculous comments, which you actually believe
� *are true*, are, as I said, ridiculous. Worse, you are writing them
Who mentioned anything about them being true Chris, just speculation
:-P
<SNIP> because i cannot be bothered....
Regardz,
M!ke C.
--
.--------------------------------- ---- - -- --------.
| AMiGA 1200EZT 060/PPC@240Mhz,82Mb RAM __/\__ |
| 4 HDD,DD FD,5 CD-ROMS,CDrW,ZiP250 \ o0 / bUDDa/S^D|
| SCSI+IDE, 56kModem, BVGfX, 19"VDU /_'-_\ |
`------------------------------- --- - \/ -- ------'
http://fly.to/BuddasWurld ICQ: 29173597
_____________________________________________________________
NetConnect mailing list. To unsubscribe, send an 'unsubcribe'
message to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
