On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 1:11 PM, David Miller <[email protected]> wrote: > From: Johannes Berg <[email protected]> > Date: Mon, 08 May 2017 10:55:12 +0200 > >> >>> +static inline bool netif_is_lwd(struct net_device *dev) >>> +{ >>> + return !!(dev->priv_flags & IFF_LWT_NETDEV); >>> +} >> >> Am I the only one who thinks that this "LWT_NETDEV" vs "LWD" is a bit >> confusing? > > Agreed, my old eyes can't discern them at a distance :-)
agree. mix of LWT_NETDEV and LWD can get confusing. LWT already stands for Light Weight Tunnel..., this can only be LWD or LWN ;)....if people don't confuse it with some weekly news device :)
