On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 5:57 PM, David Ahern <dsah...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 5/8/17 1:11 PM, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Johannes Berg <johan...@sipsolutions.net>
>> Date: Mon, 08 May 2017 10:55:12 +0200
>>
>>>
>>>> +static inline bool netif_is_lwd(struct net_device *dev)
>>>> +{
>>>> + return !!(dev->priv_flags & IFF_LWT_NETDEV);
>>>> +}
>>>
>>> Am I the only one who thinks that this "LWT_NETDEV" vs "LWD" is a bit
>>> confusing?
>>
>> Agreed, my old eyes can't discern them at a distance :-)
>>
>
> perhaps it is the tiny font your old eyes are having trouble with :-)
>
> I am fine with Johannes' suggestion -- just spell it out:
> netif_is_lwt_netdev
>
> where lwt = LightWeighT
makes sense...but this does sound like a 'light weight tunnel
netdevice' though.....just cause 'LWT' already expands to 'light
weight tunnel'
