We have tried the CUSeeMe clients on a variety of machines with various
configurations. We consistently have had a difficult time maintaining a
conference for more than forty-five minutes on any of them. We had to move
to the NetMeeting client (with video) to have it reliable enough. It also
is limited if you really need the T.120 data sharing capabilities.
>From the other side, their multipoint conferencing facilities (in with
MeetingPoint) work nicely if you need up to twelve images on the screen at
once. They use a proprietary peer-to-peer interface for achieving it, as
opposed to Exchange 2000's IP Multicast approach.
Regards,
=D-
Derek R. Flickinger
INTERACTIVE HOMES, INC.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Andrew Sheldon
Sent: Monday, July 17, 2000 13:09
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [NetMeeting] Meeting Point
Its probably a little of topic but I was wondering why you want to use NM
when cuseeme has cuseeme clinet PRO whcih (allegedly) does the same thing
plus video? Anyone any views on meetingpoint+cuseeme PRO clients?
Andy Sheldon
work4sure.com
*********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********
On 17/07/2000 at 09:49 Brach Merredith-MBRACH1 wrote:
>Has anyone used NetMeeting in conjunction with another tool such as
>MeetingPoint by CUSeeMe (http://www.cuseeme.com/software/meetingpoint.htm)?
>I'm wondering if anyone has information about how well they work together,
>and maybe a little better explanation about HOW they work together.
Thanks!
>
>Merrie Brach
>NSS Desktop Solutions Intern
>ph # 847.632.2738
>SkyWriter Pager: 888.327.6652
>mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.meetingbywire.com/Mailinglist.htm for unsubscribe information
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
