> On 16 Nov 2015, at 12:55, Juergen Schoenwaelder > <j.schoenwael...@jacobs-university.de> wrote: > > On Sat, Nov 14, 2015 at 09:05:00AM -0800, Andy Bierman wrote: >> >> YANG 1.1 is going to take 2 more years if we slowly revisit every issue. >> I thought the whole point of the issue tracker was to prevent this sort >> of thing. The rule should be "what new details have emerged that >> should cause us to change the previous decision?" >> > > Andy, please note that this is a discussion primarily around the JSON > document and not around the YANG 1.1 document.
Except that it might be useful to clarify in 6020bis whether "anyxml" really means 1. specifically "any XML", or 2. schema-less data in any supported encoding. If it is #1, then arguably c/e are not acceptable options for the JSON encoding. I prefer #2. Lada > > /js > > -- > Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH > Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany > Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <http://www.jacobs-university.de/> -- Ladislav Lhotka, CZ.NIC Labs PGP Key ID: E74E8C0C _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
