On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 3:55 AM, Juergen Schoenwaelder < j.schoenwael...@jacobs-university.de> wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 14, 2015 at 09:05:00AM -0800, Andy Bierman wrote: > > > > YANG 1.1 is going to take 2 more years if we slowly revisit every issue. > > I thought the whole point of the issue tracker was to prevent this sort > > of thing. The rule should be "what new details have emerged that > > should cause us to change the previous decision?" > > > > Andy, please note that this is a discussion primarily around the JSON > document and not around the YANG 1.1 document. > > That doesn't mean we haven't discussed this issue for a long time already. I thought we decided anyxml is not that interoperable and so we have anydata that is supposedly interoperable. So why try to constrain the JSON encoding? For anyone sending mixed mode XML encoded as JSON, they can get creative and do whatever they want. For everybody else, anydata is simple enough to encode and decode. > /js > Andy > > -- > Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH > Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany > Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <http://www.jacobs-university.de/> >
_______________________________________________ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
