On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 01:09:20PM +0100, Ladislav Lhotka wrote: > > > On 16 Nov 2015, at 12:55, Juergen Schoenwaelder > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Sat, Nov 14, 2015 at 09:05:00AM -0800, Andy Bierman wrote: > >> > >> YANG 1.1 is going to take 2 more years if we slowly revisit every issue. > >> I thought the whole point of the issue tracker was to prevent this sort > >> of thing. The rule should be "what new details have emerged that > >> should cause us to change the previous decision?" > >> > > > > Andy, please note that this is a discussion primarily around the JSON > > document and not around the YANG 1.1 document. > > Except that it might be useful to clarify in 6020bis whether "anyxml" really > means > > 1. specifically "any XML", or > > 2. schema-less data in any supported encoding. > > If it is #1, then arguably c/e are not acceptable options for the JSON > encoding. I prefer #2. >
I believe the outcome of the discussion is that anyxml means any XML. There also was clear agreement to not change the definition of anyxml. /js -- Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <http://www.jacobs-university.de/> _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
