Hi, Concerning cooperation with the IEEE, we have in place a mechanism of communication between the IETF and IEEE 802. Mahesh Jethanadani and myself are involved. The key thing is to send information about important milestones (like Last Calls) to the IEEE, it can be done via email, no need for formal liaison messages. If we identify tougher issues (like duplication, or inconsistencies) we can set small shared teams to work things out.
Regards, Dan From: netmod [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Zhuangyan (Yan) Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2016 5:26 AM To: Kent Watsen; [email protected] Subject: Re: [netmod] call for consensus to adopt draft-wilton-netmod-intf-ext-yang as NETMOD WG draft Sorry for the late response. It took some time to review this draft and models. And Yes, I support adopting this document as a WG item. To me, the common model is something useful. There perhaps some overlaps in Ethernet-like model with things in IEEE. If yes, we’ll see how to cooperate. Best Regards, Yan 发件人: netmod [mailto:[email protected]] 代表 Kent Watsen 发送时间: 2016年3月1日 7:07 收件人: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> 主题: Re: [netmod] call for consensus to adopt draft-wilton-netmod-intf-ext-yang as NETMOD WG draft The chairs were just reviewing notes and realized that this thread never closed properly. Juergen has some concerns regarding realistic milestones, that were never addressed. Robert, can you please try to address Juergen’s concerns now? Also, there were only a two responses before indicating willingness to review the draft as it progresses (thanks Dan and Martin). Can others that support this draft and willing to review this draft say so? Thanks, Netmod Chairs From: netmod <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> on behalf of Kent Watsen <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Date: Tuesday, December 15, 2015 at 11:48 AM To: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: [netmod] call for consensus to adopt draft-wilton-netmod-intf-ext-yang as NETMOD WG draft The minutes for IETF 94 show that there was in-room support for adopting draft-wilton-netmod-intf-ext-yang as a WG draft. The minutes also show that this decision would be confirmed on the mailing list, which I am doing now. Should we move to adopt draft-wilton-netmod-intf-ext-yang as a WG item and correspondingly add this to the WG charter as a milestone? Please comment by Tuesday, December 22, 2015 at 9AM EST at which time the WG Chairs will gauge whether or not there is consensus to move forward with the document. Thanks, Kent
_______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
