Apologies for responding so late to this message. I only recently was apprised of this draft and I wanted to know if the authors can explain what the draft offers that is not already easily supported using RFC 7223?
If it is possible to support the capabilities explicitly targeted in this draft, using the existing model, does it make sense to introduce a new set of enhancements that make it possible to represent the same concepts in two ways? -- Eric ----------------- Re: [netmod] call for consensus to adopt draft-wilton-netmod-intf-ext-yang as NETMOD WG draft Kent Watsen <[email protected]> Mon, 29 February 2016 23:07 UTCShow header The chairs were just reviewing notes and realized that this thread never closed properly. Juergen has some concerns regarding realistic milestones, that were never addressed. Robert, can you please try to address Juergen’s concerns now? Also, there were only a two responses before indicating willingness to review the draft as it progresses (thanks Dan and Martin). Can others that support this draft and willing to review this draft say so? Thanks, Netmod Chairs From: netmod <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> on behalf of Kent Watsen <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Date: Tuesday, December 15, 2015 at 11:48 AM To: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: [netmod] call for consensus to adopt draft-wilton-netmod-intf-ext-yang as NETMOD WG draft The minutes for IETF 94 show that there was in-room support for adopting draft-wilton-netmod-intf-ext-yang as a WG draft. The minutes also show that this decision would be confirmed on the mailing list, which I am doing now. Should we move to adopt draft-wilton-netmod-intf-ext-yang as a WG item and correspondingly add this to the WG charter as a milestone? Please comment by Tuesday, December 22, 2015 at 9AM EST at which time the WG Chairs will gauge whether or not there is consensus to move forward with the document. Thanks, Kent Sent from my iPad
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
