Kent Has there been any progress in the IEEE on their work to produce Ethernet related models, as was mentioned earlier on in this thread?
Tom Petch ----- Original Message ----- From: "Kent Watsen" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2016 4:18 PM Subject: Re: [netmod] call for consensus to adopt draft-wilton-netmod-intf-ext-yang as NETMOD WG draft > > [I wanted to formally close this thread, modeled after Lou's recent closure of another draft] > > This poll is complete and the document is adopted, > > Authors, > > Please resubmit the draft with the only change being to rename the draft to draft-ietf-netmod-intf-ext-yang-00 > > Thank you! > Kent (and co-chairs) > > > > From: netmod <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> on behalf of Kent Watsen <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> > Date: Monday, February 29, 2016 at 6:07 PM > To: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> > Subject: Re: [netmod] call for consensus to adopt draft-wilton-netmod-intf-ext-yang as NETMOD WG draft > > > The chairs were just reviewing notes and realized that this thread never closed properly. > > Juergen has some concerns regarding realistic milestones, that were never addressed. Robert, can you please try to address Juergen’s concerns now? > > Also, there were only a two responses before indicating willingness to review the draft as it progresses (thanks Dan and Martin). Can others that support this draft and willing to review this draft say so? > > Thanks, > Netmod Chairs > > > From: netmod <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> on behalf of Kent Watsen <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> > Date: Tuesday, December 15, 2015 at 11:48 AM > To: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> > Subject: [netmod] call for consensus to adopt draft-wilton-netmod-intf-ext-yang as NETMOD WG draft > > > The minutes for IETF 94 show that there was in-room support for adopting draft-wilton-netmod-intf-ext-yang as a WG draft. The minutes also show that this decision would be confirmed on the mailing list, which I am doing now. > > Should we move to adopt draft-wilton-netmod-intf-ext-yang as a WG item and correspondingly add this to the WG charter as a milestone? Please comment by Tuesday, December 22, 2015 at 9AM EST at which time the WG Chairs will gauge whether or not there is consensus to move forward with the document. > > Thanks, > Kent > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ -------- > _______________________________________________ > netmod mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod > _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
