On Sun, Sep 4, 2016 at 3:49 PM, Alex Campbell <[email protected]> wrote:
> What prevents features from being units of conformance? > They are in a sense. The "base module" is everything without any features. Then each feature can be added somewhat independently to the base module. So "base + feature-1" or "base + feature-2" or "base + feature-1 + feature-2", etc. can be implemented by a server. Andy > ________________________________________ > From: netmod <[email protected]> on behalf of Juergen Schoenwaelder > <[email protected]> > Sent: Friday, 2 September 2016 5:06 a.m. > To: Andy Bierman > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [netmod] How to constrain a leaf to a read-only list of > supported values? > > On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 09:41:04AM -0700, Andy Bierman wrote: > > Hi, > > > > We keep having discussions about YANG conformance related issues. > > The only unit of conformance is the YANG module, so it is possible to > > think the way to solve the conformance/discovery problem is to put every > > definition > > in its own module. This is operationally absurd of course, so someday > YANG > > is going to need a real conformance model. > > > > Yes. > > /js > > -- > Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH > Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany > Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <http://www.jacobs-university.de/> > > _______________________________________________ > netmod mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod >
_______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
