> Dale R. Worley <[email protected]> writes: >> Ladislav Lhotka <[email protected]> writes: >>> typedef Compression-Method { >>> ... >>> } >>> >>> list node { >>> config true; >>> key name; >>> >>> string name; >>> >>> leaf-list supported-compression-methods { >>> type Compression-Method; >>> config false; >>> } >>> >>> Compression-Method compression-method; >>> must "compression-method ... supported-compression-methods"; >>> }
>> The only technical problem with your mock-up is that "must" expressions >> on config nodes cannot refer to state data. > Ouch! That means that any technique like the one I proposed isn't going > to work. Indeed, it may be that there is no way to constrain a config > leaf based on value(s) provided by the implementation. It was my understanding was that this is a deliberate design decision, so that a configuration tree can always be validated offline. > Dale Alex _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
