On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 09:20:36AM +0100, Ladislav Lhotka wrote: > > I think we need protocol and YANG specs that are not tied to any particular > model and that are thus capable of matching unforeseen real-world > implementations. This is no sci-fi, HTTP and XML schema languages work this > way. >
I disagree that HTTP and XML schema languages do the same thing. Our goal is interoperable configuration of network devices; the notion of configuration datastore validation and specification of semantics goes well beyond what you usually find in web interactions, where typically all semantics are left to the implementor of a service. We validate configurations (residing in datastores), not the syntactic aspects of protocol messages. But yes, I am looking forward to a concrete I-D. /js -- Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <http://www.jacobs-university.de/> _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
