> On 21 Mar 2017, at 09:04, Juergen Schoenwaelder > <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 04:33:24PM +0100, Ladislav Lhotka wrote: >> >> I don't think that config true/false is necessarily tied to a particular set >> of datastores, it can be generalized to RW/RO. >> > > I do not agree that config true/false just means read write and I > certainly do not want semantics of statements to be changed. It is > easy to create new statements if needed.
The revised-datastores draft changes the semantics of "configuration data" - for example, the definition from RFC 6241 clearly won't apply to the "running" datastore in the new datastore model. So a new definition of configuration data will probably be needed, and this implicitly changes the semantics of the "config" statement. BTW, we use rw/ro in tree diagrams. Lada > > /js > > -- > Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH > Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany > Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <http://www.jacobs-university.de/> -- Ladislav Lhotka, CZ.NIC Labs PGP Key ID: 0xB8F92B08A9F76C67 _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
