On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 10:59:11AM +0100, Ladislav Lhotka wrote: > > If the "config" statement really carried some protocol-specific semantics > that isn't meaningful for all potential uses of YANG, it would be better to > remove it from core YANG and define it as an extension that would be > mandatory for configuration protocols that need it. >
YANG exists because we wanted to describe and manage configurations. And some people still want to do this. I understand that you want to turn YANG into a general purpose data modeling language. But I am not sure this is consensus. As of today, config true means what is defined in RFC 6020 and RFC 7950. /js -- Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <http://www.jacobs-university.de/> _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
