On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 12:11 PM, Kent Watsen <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > On 8/25/17, 2:21 PM, "Andy Bierman" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Obviously NMDA cannot be used for objects where the configuration value > set > > > and the operstate value set differ, such as with the interface > admin-status/oper-status. > > > Do you want a sentence added that says to use config false leafs as > needed within the > > > configuration entry? A sentence that says operational data is embedded > in the > > > configuration entry? > > > > Yes, and any other general guidelines around using config false. The > text I posted > > when starting this thread had some of that. The original RFC6087 text > might have > > some more. > > > OK -- I will work on adding in text from -12, your text, and Lou's text. > > > 6087bis was supposed to be a minor update, not a living draft that > doubles > > > as a YANG tutorial and ongoing issues list. > > > > ;) > > > > As much as I like RFCs, I think this content would be better served by a > Wiki. If > > we were starting for scratch (no RFC6087), then that might make sense but, > given > > where we are, not so much. So, I guess we're committed to frequent > updates on this > > document until YANG settles down. > > > It is better to have as few moving targets (and normative references) as possible. YANG modules in an RFC have to conform to a specific version of the YANG guidelines. > > > Kent // contributor > > > > > Andy
_______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
