Dear all,
I'm wondering if it's not time to classify draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis
as a BCP, as opposed to informational
This text would need to change:
This document is similar to the Structure of Management
Information
version 2 (SMIv2) usage guidelines specification [RFC4181] in intent
and structure. However, since that document was written a decade
after SMIv2 modules had been in use, it was published as a 'Best
Current Practice' (BCP). This document is not a BCP, but rather an
informational reference, intended to promote consistency in documents
containing YANG modules.
Indeed, it seems to me that the consistency in YANG modules is a pretty
important topic.
Feedback?
Regards, Benoit
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
