Hi Benoit, BCP seems right, but I wonder if there is some sort of stability metric that applies to BCPs. YANG still seems to be evolving, so I can only imagine yet another update to this document in the not too distant future. Does that disqualify it in any way?
Kent On 9/11/17, 10:16 AM, "netmod on behalf of Benoit Claise" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> on behalf of [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Dear all, I'm wondering if it's not time to classify draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis as a BCP, as opposed to informational This text would need to change: This document is similar to the Structure of Management Information version 2 (SMIv2) usage guidelines specification [RFC4181] in intent and structure. However, since that document was written a decade after SMIv2 modules had been in use, it was published as a 'Best Current Practice' (BCP). This document is not a BCP, but rather an informational reference, intended to promote consistency in documents containing YANG modules. Indeed, it seems to me that the consistency in YANG modules is a pretty important topic. Feedback? Regards, Benoit
_______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
