Hi Rob, On 9/14/2017 9:37 AM, Robert Wilton wrote: > Hi Kent & Lou, > > When do you think that it will be possible to start the adoption process > on these drafts? > > I think that the first two at least would seem to be ready for > adoption. For the 3rd draft, there still seems to be an open question > of what to do with the old state tree, but presumably that could be > solved after the draft has been adopted? I see an update for the third was published yesterday (https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-acee-netmod-rfc8022bis-02) that clarifies the intent is to replace the current modules, and presumably obsolete 8022. And now that this intended direction is clear in the draft we could poll it.
I think this still doesn't address if we need to indicate that the rfc8022 defined modules are deprecated by some other mechanisms than just replacing the RFC, e.g., by updating the old modules with all nodes marked as deprecated. I think you're right that this could be done post adoption. Of course others are free to disagree. I check with Kent and see what he thinks. Thanks, Lou > > Thanks, > Rob > > > On 30/08/2017 00:46, Kent Watsen wrote: >> Hey folks, >> >> As discussed at the last meeting, we are heading to revising existing RFCs >> to align them with NMDA. The first batch have been published as individual >> drafts: >> >> 1. https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bjorklund-netmod-rfc7223bis-00 >> 2. https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bjorklund-netmod-rfc7277bis-00 >> 3. https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-acee-netmod-rfc8022bis-00 >> >> Please take a look (comments welcome!) and stay tuned for the related >> adoption calls. >> >> Thanks, >> Kent (and Lou) >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> netmod mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod >> . >> > _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
