> So rfc8022bis-02 publishes the v2 module, and the the deprecated version > of the v1 module as an appendix? Lou and I were just discussing if appendix can be normative or not. I always thought no, but I haven't checked. This is a grey area, in that understanding that the old module is deprecating is not needed in order to understand the new module, and we really just to ensure extraction tools work... > I see "kind of ugly" as a feature in the this case, someone looking at > the updated v1 module isn't going to be able to miss that whatever they > are looking at is deprecated. ;-) Funny, and true K. _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
- Re: [netmod] upcoming adop... Robert Wilton
- Re: [netmod] upcoming adop... Ladislav Lhotka
- Re: [netmod] upcoming adop... Robert Wilton
- Re: [netmod] upcoming adop... Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [netmod] upcoming adop... Andy Bierman
- Re: [netmod] upcoming adop... Andy Bierman
- Re: [netmod] upcoming adoptions Robert Wilton
- Re: [netmod] upcoming adoptions Lou Berger
- Re: [netmod] upcoming adoptions Kent Watsen
- Re: [netmod] upcoming adoptions Robert Wilton
- Re: [netmod] upcoming adoptions Kent Watsen
- Re: [netmod] upcoming adoption... t.petch
- Re: [netmod] upcoming adop... Lou Berger
- Re: [netmod] upcoming adop... Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [netmod] upcoming adop... t.petch
- Re: [netmod] upcoming adop... Lou Berger
- Re: [netmod] upcoming adop... Benoit Claise
- Re: [netmod] upcoming adop... Lou Berger
- Re: [netmod] upcoming adop... Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [netmod] upcoming adop... Lou Berger
- Re: [netmod] upcoming adop... Robert Wilton