Hi Kent, Mahesh, et al, I have read the draft and support publication. I have two comments on the -14 version.
1. The tree diagrams do not fit within the draft pages. Note that recent versions of pyang support the —tree-line-length parameter and this may help. 2. While it is non-normative, I’d prefer to have appendix A.1 removed. It was a mistake for vendors to mix packet filtering and route filtering in the first place and the draft should not insinuate that the model will be augmented to do this. Thanks, Acee On 10/20/17, 5:37 PM, "netmod on behalf of Kent Watsen" <[email protected] on behalf of [email protected]> wrote: > >All, > >This starts a two-week working group last call on >draft-ietf-netmod-acl-model-14. > >The working group last call ends on November 3. >Please send your comments to the netmod mailing list. > >Positive comments, e.g., "I've reviewed this document >and believe it is ready for publication", are welcome! >This is useful and important, even from authors. > >Could the authors, explicitly CC-ed on this email, please >also confirm at this time that they are unaware of any >IPR related to this draft. > >Thank you, >Netmod Chairs > > >_______________________________________________ >netmod mailing list >[email protected] >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
