I agree with Acee, would like to see the example he mentions removed in case people try to copy it. But otherwise I am happy to see this document published.
Cheers, Einar On 26 Oct 2017, at 10:46, Acee Lindem (acee) <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Hi Mahesh, On 10/25/17, 9:22 PM, "Mahesh Jethanandani" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Acee, Thanks for reviewing the draft. On Oct 25, 2017, at 6:21 AM, Acee Lindem (acee) <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Hi Kent, Mahesh, et al, I have read the draft and support publication. I have two comments on the -14 version. 1. The tree diagrams do not fit within the draft pages. Note that recent versions of pyang support the —tree-line-length parameter and this may help. I used the —tree-line-length=72 as the parameter to generate the tree, and that is why you see the line wrap around. I guess then you need to manually format it so it fits. 2. While it is non-normative, I’d prefer to have appendix A.1 removed. It was a mistake for vendors to mix packet filtering and route filtering in the first place and the draft should not insinuate that the model will be augmented to do this. The example is just an example of how the model can be extended. There is no implication that the model will be augmented to support mixing of packet filtering with route filtering. I understand that. However, it is more an example of how it should not be used. Do you really want to publish this? Thanks, Acee Thanks, Acee On 10/20/17, 5:37 PM, "netmod on behalf of Kent Watsen" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> on behalf of [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: All, This starts a two-week working group last call on draft-ietf-netmod-acl-model-14. The working group last call ends on November 3. Please send your comments to the netmod mailing list. Positive comments, e.g., "I've reviewed this document and believe it is ready for publication", are welcome! This is useful and important, even from authors. Could the authors, explicitly CC-ed on this email, please also confirm at this time that they are unaware of any IPR related to this draft. Thank you, Netmod Chairs _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod Mahesh Jethanandani [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
_______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
