Hi Kent, The last remaining open issue is about adding containers for addresses (source, destination) and ports (source, destination). A user has the choice to use the container or leaf for address (source/dest) and port (source/dest). With this, the user can use the Yang model to configure scale ACL's.
I did some preliminary work on this in August/September last year, but ran out of time to explore this fully as I had to upload my other changes by particular dates. The non implementation of this does not detract from the usability of the ACL model. Closing the issue to completion will require me to revisit and implement the yang solution for container support in the model. Thanks, Sonal. On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 3:33 PM, Kent Watsen <[email protected]> wrote: > > H Mahesh, > > >> - There is an open issue in the document (section 8) - are we going > >> to resolve that during WG last call or is this a leftover? > > > > This will be resolved in the next version of the module. It is > > documented under Issues tab in GitHub. Should we remove it from > > the draft? > > Most of Juergen's comments are editorial in nature and can truly be > handled as part of the LC process, but this open issue has me worried, as > it may result in a significant technical change. > > What will it take to close this open issue? Is it just a matter of the > getting the WG to agree that it's not an issue, or do we already know that > it is a real issue and only the solution is pending? > > Thanks, > Kent > > > > > _______________________________________________ > netmod mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod >
_______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
