Juergen Schoenwaelder <[email protected]> writes: > On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 08:05:54PM +0000, Kent Watsen wrote: >> >> Thank you all for the important discussion since the completion of WGLC on >> Nov 6th. >> >> Per normal process, drafts typically progress once LC comments are address >> unless significant faults are found. Post LC comments have been made, which >> needed consideration, notably the relationship with NMDA and rfc7895bis and >> an alternate representation of inline schema. These have been considered >> respecting their impact on the last call consensus and it is the position of >> the chairs that it is best to advance the existing schema-mount document at >> this time. >> > > If we take the formal road, then you may want to read again Robert > Wilton's email posted on November 2nd (Thu, 2 Nov 2017 17:06:34 +0000) > again. He does talk about YANG library alignment - so YANG library > alignment is not just post LC comments. (I personally prefer to have > technical discussion than formal discussions but if it is necessary to > g there...)
As a matter of fact, I proposed pretty much the same thing already back in March 2017: https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netmod/current/msg18045.html Lada > > /js > > -- > Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH > Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany > Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <https://www.jacobs-university.de/> > > _______________________________________________ > netmod mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod -- Ladislav Lhotka Head, CZ.NIC Labs PGP Key ID: 0xB8F92B08A9F76C67 _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
