On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 09:35:49AM -0500, joel jaeggli wrote: > > Once the document is adopted by the working group it's the working > group's document. > > The consensus call was made back here: > > https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netmod/current/msg19433.html
So then go ahead and resolve _all_ comments that were made during WG last call. > To my mind the discussion that we picked up in the new year highlights > the limitations of the existing draft without it being fatally flawed. > To wit (and this is my opinion), this one is stable and should proceed, > clearing the path for drafts with normative dependencies; we should > proceed with an update in a timely fashion. I believe the YANG library alignment issue was raised earlier than 'new year' and actually during WG last call. Since the YANG library interim (NETCONF WG) in December we have a clearer view on YANG library. Anyway, I expect that all WG last call comments will be dealt with - otherwise there is a process error. /js -- Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <https://www.jacobs-university.de/> _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
