Henrik, Benoit

My first e-mail was sloppily worded.  What I meant was RFCxxxx in the
Reference clause of a YANG module, since I think that those should be in
the Reference section as well.

I think that it should apply to the Description clause as well, but that
might be more debatable i.e. missing when it appears in Reference I
would see as an error, but missing when it appears in Description, um
perhaps a warning?

Tom Petch

----- Original Message -----
From: "Benoit Claise" <bcla...@cisco.com>
To: "t.petch" <ie...@btconnect.com>; "Henrik Levkowetz"
<hen...@levkowetz.com>; "NETMOD Working Group" <netmod@ietf.org>
Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2018 11:56 AM

> Hi Henrik,
> Could this check be added to idnits?
> Regards, Benoit
> > I just came across (yet) another example of a reference to an RFC in
> > description clause of a YANG module that appears nowhere else in the
> > I-D.
> >
> > This seems to be a systematic error that some YANG module authors
> > can the tools be modified to pick it up?  The logic is simple
> >
> > The latest example is in draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-rip-09 which fails to
> > reference RFC5952;  I think that the I-D is in the RFC Editor queue.
> >
> > Tom Petch
> >
> > .
> >

netmod mailing list

Reply via email to