Henrik, Benoit My first e-mail was sloppily worded. What I meant was RFCxxxx in the Reference clause of a YANG module, since I think that those should be in the Reference section as well.
I think that it should apply to the Description clause as well, but that might be more debatable i.e. missing when it appears in Reference I would see as an error, but missing when it appears in Description, um perhaps a warning? Tom Petch ----- Original Message ----- From: "Benoit Claise" <bcla...@cisco.com> To: "t.petch" <ie...@btconnect.com>; "Henrik Levkowetz" <hen...@levkowetz.com>; "NETMOD Working Group" <firstname.lastname@example.org> Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2018 11:56 AM > Hi Henrik, > > Could this check be added to idnits? > > Regards, Benoit > > I just came across (yet) another example of a reference to an RFC in a > > description clause of a YANG module that appears nowhere else in the > > I-D. > > > > This seems to be a systematic error that some YANG module authors make; > > can the tools be modified to pick it up? The logic is simple enough. > > > > The latest example is in draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-rip-09 which fails to > > reference RFC5952; I think that the I-D is in the RFC Editor queue. > > > > Tom Petch > > > > . > > > _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list email@example.com https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod