On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 12:12 PM, Juergen Schoenwaelder <
[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 11:03:02AM -0800, Andy Bierman wrote:
> >
> > The reason the deviation is a list is because it has a name and revision.
> > Or it did until it was removed.
> >
>
> > I prefer to keep the contents of the "module" list the
> > same as RFC 7895. The "improvement" is much worse --
> > harder to use by clients and provides less information to clients.
>
> Which "improvement" do you mean? Which information is lost? In which
> situations are things harder to use?
>
The supposed improvement is the /yang-library subtree.
It is now much harder to determine the modules used by the server
because there are 3 data structures to retrieve and process instead of 1.
The module list used to have a deviation list so revisions could be
identified
list deviation {
key "name revision";
description
"List of YANG deviation module names and revisions
used by this server to modify the conformance of
the module associated with this entry. Note that
the same module can be used for deviations for
multiple modules, so the same entry MAY appear
within multiple 'module' entries.
The deviation module MUST be present in the 'module'
list, with the same name and revision values.
The 'conformance-type' value will be 'implement' for
the deviation module.";
uses common-leafs;
}
> /js
>
Andy
>
> --
> Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
> Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany
> Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <https://www.jacobs-university.de/>
>
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
