On Fri, 2018-04-27 at 16:47 +0200, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote: > On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 04:34:38PM +0200, Ladislav Lhotka wrote: > > > [...] define a special datastore for it, such as "error-messages". > > This seems worse than using, well, RFC 8040 yang-data. The proper
Why it seems worse? > clear solution for RPCs and actions would be to enable the definition > of error details right in the rpc/action definition (input, output, > error). Agreed. > > But something like yang-data seems to have uses in other contexts. So other datastores may be defined. I assume that YANG library data can be used independently, not just on a NC/RC server, pretty much along the lines of draft- lengyel-netmod-yang-instance-data. Lada > > /js > -- Ladislav Lhotka Head, CZ.NIC Labs PGP Key ID: 0xB8F92B08A9F76C67 _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
