The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8342,
"Network Management Datastore Architecture (NMDA)".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5362

--------------------------------------
Type: Editorial
Reported by: Rohit R Ranade <rohitrran...@huawei.com>

Section: 2

Original Text
-------------
The convention adopted by the interfaces
   data model [RFC8343] and the IP data model [RFC8344] was to use two
   separate branches rooted at the root of the data tree: one branch for
   configuration data objects and one branch for operational state data
   objects.


Corrected Text
--------------
The convention adopted by the interfaces
   data model [RFC7223] and the IP data model [RFC7277] was to use two
   separate branches rooted at the root of the data tree: one branch for
   configuration data objects and one branch for operational state data
   objects.


Notes
-----
The duplication of definition and separation of operational state data and 
configuration data happened in RFC7223 and RFC7277. RFC8343 and RFC8344 have 
corrected this using NMDA architecture

Instructions:
-------------
This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 

--------------------------------------
RFC8342 (draft-ietf-netmod-revised-datastores-10)
--------------------------------------
Title               : Network Management Datastore Architecture (NMDA)
Publication Date    : March 2018
Author(s)           : M. Bjorklund, J. Schoenwaelder, P. Shafer, K. Watsen, R. 
Wilton
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : Network Modeling
Area                : Operations and Management
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG

_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod

Reply via email to