On 6/25/18 14:56, Kent Watsen wrote: > > The authors of yang-data-ext met today to discuss how to move this draft > forward. After about an hour, we decided that the best course of action is > to: > > * clarify RFC 8040 rc:yang-data for the zerotouch use case > - and update the zerotouch draft to use rc:yang-data > > * request this WG for the unadoption of this draft > - the notification-messages draft solution is TBD > > Can the working group, especially the chairs and the affected document > authors (all CC-ed) please review this proposal?
What about the ability to augment yang-data? The proposed instance data draft also makes use of yang-data-ext, and I have a use case to augment some of its MD. I realize this draft is not a WG item [yet], but I wonder what the co-authors thought around the fate of the augments work. Joe _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
