Suresh Krishnan has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-netmod-artwork-folding-09: Discuss
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netmod-artwork-folding/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- DISCUSS: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- After some thought I think there are two things about this document that make me uncomfortable enough to ballot Discuss. a) Due to its home in the netmod WG it is highly likely that people outside the yang community have not paid enough attention to this work. Since this is applicable to code fragments of all kinds, I think the home chosen for this RFC might have inadvertently limited input from the broader community. b) Given a) I think it is better that this document go forward as an Informational document rather than a BCP so that use of this technique becomes optional, without the force of a BCP behind it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I do agree with my Abstaining colleagues that this should probably not be on the IETF stream but I think the work is useful enough to go forward. _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
