From: Kent Watsen <[email protected]> 
Sent: 2020. február 14., péntek 20:15
To: Balázs Lengyel <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: 
draft-ietf-netmod-yang-instance-file-format-06 to -07

 

Have the YANG modules been validated and tested for formatting?

(i.e., pyang -f yang --keep-comments --yang-line-length 69 filename) 

BALAZS: yes. With pyang offline and yangvalidator.com

 

Have the examples in the draft validated against the YANG module?

BALAZS: Only manually. How do you validate samples conforming to a yang data 
structure ?

 

Please review the Normative/Informative status of the references.

Not looking carefully, but RFCs 2119 and 8174 should be Normative, 

and I think RFCs 3688 and 6020 should be Informative, right?

BALAZS: OK, changed in rev 08 

 

All of the “import” statements in the YANG module are missing a

“reference” statement.

BALAZS: 

Added:

rfc6991 for types added. 

Already present: 

rfc8342 for datastores

ietf-netmod-yang-data-ext for ietf-yang-structure-ext

 

Please add a paragraph to Section 5.2 preceding the YANG module

indicating all the aforementioned Normative references.

BALAZS: OK, I did it, but 

this is not what is required by https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8407#section-3.9.

I also see no value in this statement.

 

The copyright in the YANG module needs to be 2020 (not 2019)

BALAZS: OK

 

Please ensure a blank line between paragraphs in the “description"

statements.

BALAZS: OK

 

Please add a statement to the Introduction regarding why the module

Isn’t compliant with NMDA.

BALAZS: Sorry, don’t understand. Why is this not compliant with NMDA ? 

IMHO it is NMDA compliant, or rather it  has nothing to do with NDMA.

 

The tree diagram does not adhere to the syntax described in 

draft-ietf-netmod-yang-data-ext.  

BALAZS: OK I try, but what actually is the problem? Any help would be really 
appreciated.

Sadly 

pyang -p ../ietfYams ietf-yang-instance-data\@2020-03-06.yang -f tree 
--tree-print-yang-data --tree-print-yang-data

doesn’t print out anything, so I am handcrafting.

I just updated pyang from git. Any idea why this doesn’t work for me?

It would be good if YangValidator would print out the tree. At some point it 
did. Not now. :-(

Please update the first sentence  in Section 5.1 to also reference 
draft-ietf-netmod-yang-data-ext.

BALZS: OK

 

Please ensure that the planning-text version of the draft passes

IDNITS (https://www6.ietf.org/tools/idnits 
<https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=e5cfab15-b91ba273-e5cfeb8e-8610d8a762ca-c786959c5f6d65dc&q=1&e=9a66002a-9006-4173-87aa-d650b9cbdf03&u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww6.ietf.org%2Ftools%2Fidnits>
 ) at the “verbose output”

level and correct any issues found, or explain why they shouldn’t

be corrected.

BALAZS: OK, corrected

 

 

Thanks,

Kent  // shepherd

 





On Feb 14, 2020, at 11:03 AM, Balázs Lengyel <[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> > wrote:

 

Hello Chairs,
I replied to Juergen, and exchanged some additional mails with him. I updated 
the draft to draft-ietf-netmod-yang-instance-file-format-07. Please take it 
forward in the process.

https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=ed368c2e-b1bcaefa-ed36ccb5-0cc47ad93e6a-1bf0817821133165
 
<https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=ed368c2e-b1bcaefa-ed36ccb5-0cc47ad93e6a-1bf0817821133165&q=1&e=b8630aed-b037-42b0-a579-0e6e8067e0eb&u=https%3A%2F%2Ftools.ietf.org%2Fhtml%2Fdraft-ietf-netmod-yang-instance-file-format-07>
 
&q=1&e=b8630aed-b037-42b0-a579-0e6e8067e0eb&u=https%3A%2F%2Ftools.ietf.org%2Fhtml%2Fdraft-ietf-netmod-yang-instance-file-format-07
Regards Balazs

-----Original Message-----
From: netmod <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > On 
Behalf Of Kent Watsen
Sent: 2020. február 9., vasárnap 20:23
To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 
Subject: Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: 
draft-ietf-netmod-yang-instance-file-format-06

This message closes the WGLC.

Authors, please respond to Juergen’s message from Jan 20, ultimately posting an 
update to the draft.

Thanks,
Kent // as shepherd






On Jan 7, 2020, at 7:41 AM, Kent Watsen <[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> > wrote:


This begins a two-week Working Group Last Call (WGLC) on 
draft-ietf-netmod-yang-instance-file-format-06.  The WGLC ends on Jan 21.  
Please send your comments to the working group mailing list.

Positive comments, e.g., "I've reviewed this document and believe it is ready 
for publication", are welcome!  This is useful and important, even from 
authors.  Objections, concerns, and suggestions are also welcomed at this time.

Thank you,
NETMOD Chairs

_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod 
<https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=89fe7c6a-d52a750c-89fe3cf1-8610d8a762ca-ab9209e107d110d3&q=1&e=9a66002a-9006-4173-87aa-d650b9cbdf03&u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ietf.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fnetmod>
 


_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod 
<https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=ef180575-b3cc0c13-ef1845ee-8610d8a762ca-c0ef022d895b1910&q=1&e=9a66002a-9006-4173-87aa-d650b9cbdf03&u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ietf.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fnetmod>
 

 

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod

Reply via email to