On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 10:00 AM Juergen Schoenwaelder < [email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 05:10:21PM +0000, Rob Wilton (rwilton) wrote: > > > > Since the YANG module versioning draft clarifies the BC/NBC rules, > perhaps we could add text to clarify this in that draft? > > > > I.e., perhaps something for section 3.1.3 of > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netmod-yang-module-versioning/ > > > > I rather have this fixed (or clarified) in RC 7950, as far as I > understand I can choose to ignore the versioning extensions and > simply use YANG 1.1, no? > > That said, draft-ietf-netmod-yang-module-versioning-02.txt says > in 3.1.2.: > > o Modifying the type of a leaf or leaf-list is NBC > > This seems to be way more restrictive than the existing YANG 1.1 rules > we have today. Perhaps that is what the versioning people want, but > then we better keep the YANG 1.1 rules and the YANG + versioning rules > separate. > > +1 This data types update does not need any new external dependencies. > /js > > Andy > -- > Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH > Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany > Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <https://www.jacobs-university.de/> > > _______________________________________________ > netmod mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod >
_______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
