> -----Original Message-----
> From: Juergen Schoenwaelder <[email protected]>
> Sent: 25 February 2021 18:01
> To: Rob Wilton (rwilton) <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [netmod] type equivalence
>
> On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 05:10:21PM +0000, Rob Wilton (rwilton) wrote:
> >
> > Since the YANG module versioning draft clarifies the BC/NBC rules,
> perhaps we could add text to clarify this in that draft?
> >
> > I.e., perhaps something for section 3.1.3 of
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netmod-yang-module-versioning/
> >
>
> I rather have this fixed (or clarified) in RC 7950, as far as I
> understand I can choose to ignore the versioning extensions and
> simply use YANG 1.1, no?
[RW]
As a contributor:
I presume so.
As an AD:
Whether this can be done as a verified errata isn't so clear, but would
obviously depend on the proposed text.
>
> That said, draft-ietf-netmod-yang-module-versioning-02.txt says
> in 3.1.2.:
>
> o Modifying the type of a leaf or leaf-list is NBC
>
> This seems to be way more restrictive than the existing YANG 1.1 rules
> we have today. Perhaps that is what the versioning people want, but
> then we better keep the YANG 1.1 rules and the YANG + versioning rules
> separate.
[RW]
As a contributor:
That is just new text recently added for the config false nodes. I think that
it just needs some worth smithing, possibly along with the rest of that section.
Thanks,
Rob
>
> /js
>
> --
> Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
> Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany
> Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <https://www.jacobs-university.de/>
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
