On Fri, Dec 31, 2021 at 2:01 AM Ladislav Lhotka <ladislav.lho...@nic.cz> wrote:
> Carsten Bormann <c...@tzi.org> writes: > > > On 2021-12-30, at 13:29, tom petch <ie...@btconnect.com> wrote: > >> > >> when "../../../../../../nw:network-types/tet:te-topology/“ > > > > I’m probably showing my ignorance about YANG again, but what is the > reason this is not phrased as > > > > when "./ancestor::nw:network-types/tet:te-topology/“ > > Yes, this would work, with a minor correction: > > when "./ancestor::node()/nw:network-types/tet:te-topology" > > This is not equivalent to the original expression. The ".." location step stands for parent::node(). The node match has to occur at a specific ancestor level. But "ancestor::node()" will match any ancestor node. Andy > because 'nw:network-types' isn't an ancestor of the context node. Also, > the initial './' isn't actually needed, hence > > when "ancestor::node()/nw:network-types/tet:te-topology" > > Lada > > > > > ? > > > > Grüße, Carsten > > > > _______________________________________________ > > netmod mailing list > > netmod@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod > > -- > Ladislav Lhotka > Head, CZ.NIC Labs > PGP Key ID: 0xB8F92B08A9F76C67 > > _______________________________________________ > netmod mailing list > netmod@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod >
_______________________________________________ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
