Martin, the problem is finding a pattern that is guaranteed to not exclude anything valid and which is simple enough to be understood and put in a YANG module. People on the Internet tried to literally capture the ABNF rules of RFC 3986 leading to regular expression monsters.
I am open for concrete suggestions. ;-) /js On Tue, Mar 08, 2022 at 09:52:23AM +0100, Martin Björklund wrote: > Hi, > > While reviewing draft-ietf-opsawg-sap-02, I had to study the type > inet:uri again. > > I assume that the type "uri" is supposed to mean the type that is > defined by the ABNF rule "URI" in RFC 3986. If my assumption is > correct I think we should make this clear in 6991bis. If my > assumption is not correct, then we definitely should add some text > that describes what is meant. > > Since (?) inet:uri is defined simply as "string" w/o any pattern, some > RFCs have been published with URIs such as "D1" and "1-0-1" (RFC > 8345). > > > > /martin -- Jürgen Schönwälder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <https://www.jacobs-university.de/> _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
