On Tue, Mar 08, 2022 at 12:12:36PM +0100, Martin Björklund wrote: > Jürgen Schönwälder <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 08, 2022 at 11:20:57AM +0100, Martin Björklund wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > You didn't answer my first question about what we actually mean - do > > > we mean the "URI" > > > > "The uri type represents a Uniform Resource Identifier > > (URI) as defined by STD 66. [...]" > > > > STD 66 resolves to RFC 3986. Maybe I do not understand your question. > > RFC 3986 defines the syntax for "URI" and "URI-reference", see > specifically section 4 and 4.1 of RFC 3986. To avoid confusion, I > suggest: > > "The uri type represents a Uniform Resource Identifier > (URI) as defined by the rule 'URI' in RFC 3986. > > or "the ABNF rule 'URI'..."
OK > (side note, is it better to refer to STD 66 rather than the RFC?) I have no idea. Since this is the only usage of STD in the document (ignoring the references), I am fine to replace it with an RFC reference. (The description has been "inherited" from the Uri TC description in RFC 5017 and it used STD 66.) /js -- Jürgen Schönwälder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <https://www.jacobs-university.de/> _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
