NETMOD WG,

We started a WGLC on the Syslog model ~7 weeks ago, to which Reshad voiced a 
concern which was addressed in last week's update, per Joe's email here: 
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/uML_a4oCZU7FdH95A6LENmCd1VI/.

Given that this draft has been a work-in-progress for some time, with numerous 
reviews, I (as Shepherd and co-Chair) am thinking to progress it now, even 
though the most recent WGLC solicited only one response, being Reshad's.

Are there any objections to this proposal?

Thanks,
Kent


> On Jan 13, 2023, at 8:04 AM, Kent Watsen <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Dear NETMOD WG,
> 
> This message begins a two-week WGLC for draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-28 
> ending on Friday, January 27th.  Here is a direct link to the HTML version of 
> the draft:
> 
>       https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-28
> 
> Positive comments, e.g., "I've reviewed this document and believe it is ready 
> for publication", are welcome!  This is useful and important, even from 
> authors.  Objections, concerns, and suggestions are also welcomed at this 
> time.
> 
> Thank you,
> Kent (as co-chair)
> 
> _______________________________________________
> netmod mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod

_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod

Reply via email to