I am going to commit a -30 with a small typo fix, and then both Mahesh and I 
are good with your proposal.

Joe

From: netmod <netmod-boun...@ietf.org> on behalf of Kent Watsen 
<kent+i...@watsen.net>
Date: Monday, March 6, 2023 at 09:22
To: netmod@ietf.org <netmod@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [netmod] WGLC on draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-28
NETMOD WG,


We started a WGLC on the Syslog model ~7 weeks ago, to which Reshad voiced a 
concern which was addressed in last week's update, per Joe's email here: 
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/uML_a4oCZU7FdH95A6LENmCd1VI/.

Given that this draft has been a work-in-progress for some time, with numerous 
reviews, I (as Shepherd and co-Chair) am thinking to progress it now, even 
though the most recent WGLC solicited only one response, being Reshad's.


Are there any objections to this proposal?


Thanks,
Kent




On Jan 13, 2023, at 8:04 AM, Kent Watsen <kent+i...@watsen.net> wrote:

Dear NETMOD WG,

This message begins a two-week WGLC for draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-28 
ending on Friday, January 27th.  Here is a direct link to the HTML version of 
the draft:

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-28

Positive comments, e.g., "I've reviewed this document and believe it is ready 
for publication", are welcome!  This is useful and important, even from 
authors.  Objections, concerns, and suggestions are also welcomed at this time.

Thank you,
Kent (as co-chair)

_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod

_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod

Reply via email to