All, thank you for the responses, especially the fresh review by Jeff Hartley.
The WGLC has successfully closed. The draft's state is now "WG Consensus: Waiting for Write-Up". I will begin the Shepherd write-up now. Kent // as co-chair and shepherd > On Mar 6, 2023, at 9:21 AM, Kent Watsen <kent+i...@watsen.net> wrote: > > NETMOD WG, > > We started a WGLC on the Syslog model ~7 weeks ago, to which Reshad voiced a > concern which was addressed in last week's update, per Joe's email here: > https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/uML_a4oCZU7FdH95A6LENmCd1VI/. > > Given that this draft has been a work-in-progress for some time, with > numerous reviews, I (as Shepherd and co-Chair) am thinking to progress it > now, even though the most recent WGLC solicited only one response, being > Reshad's. > > Are there any objections to this proposal? > > Thanks, > Kent > > >> On Jan 13, 2023, at 8:04 AM, Kent Watsen <kent+i...@watsen.net> wrote: >> >> Dear NETMOD WG, >> >> This message begins a two-week WGLC for draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-28 >> ending on Friday, January 27th. Here is a direct link to the HTML version >> of the draft: >> >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-28 >> >> Positive comments, e.g., "I've reviewed this document and believe it is >> ready for publication", are welcome! This is useful and important, even >> from authors. Objections, concerns, and suggestions are also welcomed at >> this time. >> >> Thank you, >> Kent (as co-chair) >> >> _______________________________________________ >> netmod mailing list >> netmod@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod > > _______________________________________________ > netmod mailing list > netmod@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
_______________________________________________ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
