Hello Rob! Thank you for your offer of AD sponsorship. We also reviewed the idea of using errata and I think this was viewed as cleaner in that it would be readily apparent that the template text could be used with the need for explanation. I think (and correct if I left anything out), either works to achieve the objective for this since we’re working directly with the IEEE.
Best regards, Kathleen Sent from my mobile device > On Apr 3, 2023, at 1:30 PM, Rob Wilton (rwilton) <[email protected]> wrote: > > I'm getting an out-of-office bounce from Glenn, so adding [email protected] > in the hope that either Kathleen or one of the other trustees is give an > answer more quickly. > > Thanks, > Rob > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Rob Wilton (rwilton) >> Sent: 03 April 2023 18:19 >> To: [email protected]; Deen, Glenn >> <[email protected]> >> Cc: [email protected]; The IESG <[email protected]> >> Subject: draft-moriarty-yangsecuritytext vs errata >> >> Hi Glenn, Kathleen, >> >> In addition to discussing draft-moriarty-yangsecuritytext in the NETMOD WG >> session on Friday (where the conclusion was to go the AD sponsored path), I >> also raised this issue with the IESG/IAB at the end of the IETF week, and >> someone had the suggestion of filling an errata against the YANG Author >> Guidelines (RFC 8407) to add the missing <BEGIN TEMPLATE TEXT> and <END >> TEMPLATE TEXT> markers to section 3.7.1 of RFC 8407. >> >> I know that you offered a RFC 8407-bis path, but did you also consider >> whether >> adding these markers as errata (which I would regard as being as in-scope and >> appropriate and could be marked as 'verified')? If this approach worked from >> your side, and if there are no objections from the authors or NETMOD, then I >> was wondering if that could be a more expedient path forward. >> >> Please let me know if errata would be sufficient from a trust perspective, >> otherwise, I'll go the AD sponsored route on Kathleen's draft. >> >> Regards, >> Rob _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
