On Thu, Apr 13, 2023 at 02:32:28PM -0700, Andy Bierman wrote: > > I do not see any way to interpret RFC 7950 such that a YANG > extension can be added later to another document that overrides any > normative behavior defined in RFC 7950. > > So as long as a vendor wants to claim conformance to YANG 1.1, no > MUSTs in 7950 can be violated. Period. That may be harsh, but MUST > and MUST NOT work that way.
+1 (even though we may be getting off topic here) /js -- Jürgen Schönwälder Constructor University Bremen gGmbH Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <https://constructor.university/> _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
