------ Forwarded message ------ From: S. Voortman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: 17 Jul 2007 1250 Subject: NetSurf Licence
Hoi Michael, Op Sun, 15 Jul 2007 01:17:18 +0200 schreef Michael Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > 1) Formalise GPL version 2 as being the GPL version which NetSurf is > licensed under. This may be found at > http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-2.0.html > > 2) Come to an agreement about whether to permit the user to relicense > the software under future GPL versions. For reference, GPL version > 3 has been recently released. This may be found at > http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-3.0.html > > 3) Include a specific exemption to permit linking against OpenSSL. > > 4) License the Messages files, window templates and documentation > under the GPL, as per proposals 1-3. > > On point 2, please indicate one of the following: > > a) Yes, I want the relicensing clause and would object if > it's not present. > > b) Yes, I'd like the clause but am not sufficiently bothered > to raise an objection if there is none. > > c) No, I'd prefer the clause wasn't present but am not > sufficiently bothered to raise an objection if it is present. > > d) No, I do not want the relicensing clause at all and would > object if it were present. > > e) I don't mind either way. > On points 1, 2, 3 and 4, we require responses from: > Gerard van Katwijk > Simon Voortman We only translated the Message file into Dutch. I don't mind about making that public domain, and I also don't mind about licensing it, so please do with it as you see fit and under which license you choose. Cheers, Simon. ------ End forwarded message ------ -- Michael Drake (tlsa) http://www.smoothartist.com/
