Op Sun, 15 Jul 2007 01:17:18 +0200 schreef Michael Drake
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
1) Formalise GPL version 2 as being the GPL version which NetSurf is
licensed under. This may be found at
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-2.0.html
2) Come to an agreement about whether to permit the user to relicense
the software under future GPL versions. For reference, GPL version
3 has been recently released. This may be found at
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-3.0.html
3) Include a specific exemption to permit linking against OpenSSL.
4) License the Messages files, window templates and documentation
under the GPL, as per proposals 1-3.
On point 2, please indicate one of the following:
a) Yes, I want the relicensing clause and would object if
it's not present.
b) Yes, I'd like the clause but am not sufficiently bothered
to raise an objection if there is none.
c) No, I'd prefer the clause wasn't present but am not
sufficiently bothered to raise an objection if it is present.
d) No, I do not want the relicensing clause at all and would
object if it were present.
e) I don't mind either way.
On points 1, 2, 3 and 4, we require responses from:
Gerard van Katwijk
Simon Voortman
We only translated the Message file into Dutch. I don't mind about making
that public domain, and I also don't mind about licensing it, so please do
with it as you see fit and under which license you choose.
Thank you for this. Does Gerard share your views on this?
John.
