I actually responded to JMB's original message, but his server bounced my
message back with a "550 Verification failed for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Unrouteable address" error. $DEITY knows what's wrong, but it's not a problem
on my end (I can't find anything wrong with the mail or DNS config on my
server at least, and his domain is the only one that's ever bounced valid
mail, citing a domain verification failure).
Hm. Very odd. I'll poke our postmaster appropriately. Thanks.
1) Formalise GPL version 2 as being the GPL version which NetSurf is
licensed under. This may be found at
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-2.0.html
GPLv2 is fine by me. It's the version I think most people are familiar with (me
included).
2) Come to an agreement about whether to permit the user to relicense
the software under future GPL versions. For reference, GPL version 3
has been recently released. This may be found at
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-3.0.html
I haven't got any opinions either way on adding the "... or any future
version of the GPL" clause, though I'm a little apprehensive in that if the
FSF add something that I really don't agree with, I'm kinda stuck. The code I
submitted was minor, and I'm pretty sure most of it is long gone, but I'm
ceding judgement to the project leaders here. Basically, this is a "do what
'The Team' think is best for the project".
3) Include a specific exemption to permit linking against OpenSSL.
I can't see any problem with adding an exemption for OpenSSL.
Thanks for these,
John.
