On Mon, 2009-06-08 at 10:46 +0100, Richard Porter wrote: > On 8 Jun 2009 John-Mark Bell wrote: > > >> but for idealogical reasons, > > > I have no idea what you mean by this. > > I mean that you have decided not to implement target="_new" because > you believe that it isn't valid html and therefore shouldn't be > supported.
Er, no. There was a bug. It is now fixed. Quite how you infer ideology from that, I have no idea. John.
